




|
UXO in
Panama
| With
no party assuming responsibility for thousands of acres of
UXO-infested land, the fate of Panama’s ex-United States artillery
ranges remains unresolved. The grueling task of transforming the
unusable land falls to the Explosive Ordnance Disposal community
leaving the tainted ground waiting for release. |
by Keith
Feigenbaum, MAIC
Unlike a
number of other Latin American countries, Panama’s political situation
and the resulting military unrest have neither caused nor contributed to
its current UXO contamination. While the cause of UXO contamination in
Panama is clear—the use of once U.S.-owned military bases as practice
artillery ranges—officials for the United States and Panama generally
disagree on the current state of those practice ranges and what should be
done to cure the country of its UXO "problem" (not to mention
the most pressing question of exactly who should oversee the clearance
efforts). The purpose of this article is not to take sides, place blame or
to make moral judgments in this matter. Rather, the purpose is to present
the facts on UXO contamination in Panama. Regardless of who placed UXO in
Panama or who holds the responsibility for removing the UXO, this matter
remains a technical issue that needs to be revealed and dealt with in the
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) community.
 |
| A
Panamanian Ecological Police sergeant looks at old ordnances left
in a training field. |
Background
UXO
contamination in Panama is limited to three former U.S. military bases
along the Panama Canal. U.S. military officials have been using the
Empire, Balboa West and Piña firing ranges on these bases for artillery
practice for about 70 years. Under the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977, these
bases were returned to Panamanian control in 1999. Prior to the return of
the 37,300 Canal Zone acres, the U.S. Department of State’s Interagency
Working Group (IWG) on Demining recognized the Panamanian government’s
concern that the remaining UXO would not be cleared before the return of
the ranges. However, the IWG refuted Panama’s claim that the United
States was contractually and morally responsible for clearing UXO from the
vacated ranges.
An IWG
statement from June 1998 expressed the United States' view of the matter
as "a range remediation issue, not a humanitarian demining one."
Thus, the United States does not view the ranges as land fit to be
developed for commercial or residential purposes. Rather, the U.S.
military recommended that the ranges be sealed off. The statement
continues, "U.S. humanitarian demining funds should not be used to
clear current or former U.S. military ranges, since this would set a
precedent of using U.S. humanitarian demining assistance to clear former
U.S. military bases and ranges around the world."
This
statement is the official position of the U.S. government—a position
that stands today. Thus, any efforts by Panama to pressure the United
States into returning to the sites to conduct UXO removal, which is
estimated to cost between $400 million (U.S.) to $1 billion, have been met
with this response. According to an article in the April 26, 2000 issue of
Ottawa Citizen, the United States maintains that it did, in fact, clean up
most of the sites, having removed 8,500 pieces of UXO and about 60 tons of
shrapnel from the ranges. Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. George Rhynedance
told the Ottawa Citizen that the Panama Canal Treaty requires the United
States to clear the ranges "to the extent practicable." However,
the United States deemed much of the Canal Zone to be unfit for clearance
for environmental reasons.
Current
Situation
After
decades of bombardment by various munitions, the Empire, Balboa West and
Piña, ranges are reported to contain about 120,000 pieces of UXO. Michael
E. Short of Tennessee’s EOD Technology, Inc. (EODT), a provider of
ordnance and explosives services, reported his findings from EODT’s
attempts to remove some of these munitions in "UXO and the Panama
Canal." Short reported that from March 1998 through August 1999 the
EODT dealt with the unique challenges of removing explosives from the
Canal Zone’s jungle terrain. While dealing with the sharp 12 to 20
feet-high kuna grasses, he explains that EOD specialists faced a wide
variety of explosives. These included: UXO, 60 mm and 81 mm mortars, 40 mm
HE, 105 mm and 155 mm, AT-4, 90 mm and 106 mm RR, 2.36 3.5, SMAW, LAW,
2.75, specialty rounds and submunitions. In order to clear some of these
munitions, EODT used procedures ranging from the burning of cut vegetation
to the use of defoliants and heavy duty weed eaters. The presence of
numerous holes, craters, ravines, streams and steep hills in the jungle
terrain also limited the use of vehicles, which were cut off from project
areas during the rainy season.
Conclusion
Though
neither Panama nor the U.S. agrees on responsibility for removing UXO
along the Canal, a solution must be reached for restoring the land to a
safe and usable state. Because no one player stands accountable for
environmental restoration, it is up to the EOD community to tackle the
mammoth task of returning healthy land to the Panamanian people. In the
meantime, the ex-ranges wait as prisoners of their own contamination, cut
off from the rest of the world, in a state of dormant disuse.
|